Does it make any sense to you that the majority of mail-in ballots in Florida are arriving before Early Voting Starts?
Wouldn't you think that most of them SHOULD BE arriving during early voting & election day since that is when voter guides and information is generally available for who to vote for?
In some counties more than 70% of the mail ballots were returned before Early Voting Started:
Bradford = 75.6%
Calhoun = 73.2%
Citrus = 70%
Escambia = 72.7%
Gulf = 71.3%
Highlands = 71%
Holmes = 74.5%
Lake = 71.4%
Lee = 70.5%
Levy = 70.3%
Marion = 70%
Okeechobee = 71.8%
(pause the video and check the lower left corner to see your county's percentage)
If you also watch the blue vs red columns, you will see strange instances of more mail in ballots arriving on a single day BEFORE EARLY VOTING than on election day. Some are higher volumes than the entire last week of the election.
In some cases, these mail-ins are sitting for more than 30 days before they are processed.
While working with Draza Smith (an election data expert who explored the vote tabulator results over time) some years back, she pointed out that by the time early voting started in 2020, that Biden and Trump were somehow 50-50 in Florida.
I asked if they could use Mail In Ballots that arrived early to make that possible and now we have the analysis that show something ain't right with mail in ballots all over Florida.
I don't trust the machines at all... but when they use mail in ballots like this, you will can still hand count paper to a loss.
When you look at all mail-in ballot states like Washington, Colorado and California, you can rest assured that even dumb liberals are not voting for this madness.
There is an industrialize, systematic steal going on that is delivering truckloads of ballots to cover up their rigging.
If printers have the capacity to print and mail over 1 million ballots, all they have to do is add a few steps to fill out ballots and print a signature on them to pull this off.
You will only get to observe those signatures through a computer screen.
One of the pervious systems I developed was automating training certificates.
I would capture the instructor's signature once and then I would digitally press their signature into the hundreds of certificates they needed to issue for their students after the course concluded, saving their wrists and hours each year.
Back in 2006 when we did this, that printed signature if scanned in looked like they actually signed it.
We already know all signatures are digitized because how else can the scanners compare them in volume?
Do you really think the same signatures can't be printed on ballots in mass?
And once the machines scan them, they would match at 100%.
Still don't believe me about signature printing?
Here is a video from 11 years back showing how to print checks with signatures in them.
Do you think one person is signing more than 100 checks each week for payroll?
Signatures ALONE ARE NO SECURITY!
We need to get back to LOW VOLUME, EXCUSE APPROVED ABSENTEE BALLOTS that have a notarized PEN SIGNATURE that are physically observed instead of scanned through high volume machines.
A typically computer monitor is only 96DPI and does not have enough resolution and most important depth to CORRECTLY evaluate a signature with just a digital image.
A physical piece of paper should be reviewed while 2 party observers get to also check just absentee ballots were originally designed to operate.
COVID was used as an excuse to push high volume mail-in ballots down our throats.
And with the money that is going to fund this monster, we are buying the rope they will use to hang us with.
Share this post